Total Pageviews

Wednesday, 9 April 2014

My unanswered letter to President Henry B. Eyring in November 1998


10 Stavewood Court
Samford Qld 4520
AUSTRALIA



30th November 1998


Dear Elder Eyring,

I have been a member of the Church for almost thirty years and until recently I served as a Bishop. I am also a molecular biologist currently working at the University of Queensland. I asked to be released soon after I stumbled across some scientific research that greatly concerned me. I did not feel I should be Bishop while I harboured doubts.

The research is in the field of human population genetics. Numerous research groups from around the world are studying the mitochondrial (mt) DNA of humans to determine the relatedness of different populations. An area of particular interest to many scientists is the origin of the American Indians. Several thousand American Indians have been tested from almost 100 populations throughout North, Central and South America and about 99.5% of the individuals tested have mtDNA that is most closely related to the mtDNA of some populations in Eastern Asia. The remaining 0.5% have mtDNA that is either African or European, and is likely to have been introduced after the arrival of Columbus since the frequency of these mtDNA types in populations with virtually no western contact is essentially nil. Lehi and his family would certainly have had mtDNA most closely related to other European populations.

When I first spoke with my Stake Presidency they questioned the validity of the research and asked me to contact Elder Hafen in the Australia/Pacific Area Presidency. He put me in touch with Dr Scott Woodward, Professor of Microbiology at Brigham Young University. I have corresponded with Scott on a number of occasions over the last few months and I have tried to arrange through him an opportunity to talk with you about this issue.

I see a serious conflict between the research and things contained in the Book of Mormon. The introduction to the Book of Mormon states that the Lamanites are the principal ancestors of the American Indians. It states this because it is very clear from the contents of the Book of Mormon. This is what all my friends in the Church believe because all the prophets have declared it; it is scriptural (D&C and Book of Mormon); and it is clearly stated in other Church books such as Jesus the Christ and A Marvellous Work and a Wonder. Scott is the Church authority on this research and he has told me of his deep concern at the conflict between the church position regarding the Lamanites and the data. I think you should speak to Scott very soon about this research. I admire his strength but I don’t think it is right that he should feel alone on this.

I have also become aware of the position of the intellectuals at BYU regarding the historical setting of The Book of Mormon. Some don’t seem to be concerned if all the Lamanites have died out. Several of the scientists I have spoken to rely heavily on the work of John L. Sorenson to support their belief that when Lehi arrived in America there were millions of people already there. These “other” people were incorporated into the Lamanite and Nephite populations, used to help build their temple and fight their wars. I cannot accept this scholarship as it is very clear to me that the Book of Mormon makes no mention of any group of people that didn’t originate in Israel or thereabouts. I am also certain that many Latter-day Saints will struggle with this concept as I have.

My firm testimony of the reality of my Heavenly Father and His Son Jesus Christ remains. My once firm testimony of the truthfulness of the Book of Mormon is shattered. I am concerned that there are many people who may become very distressed about this as my wife and myself have been. I have wanted to speak to an Apostle about this issue for some time. I am certain it is only a matter of time before the wider Church community finds out about the research via the press and many will want answers. I don’t think the answers from BYU will satisfy many. I think it is crucial for the leaders of the Church to know about the situation, because they are ultimately responsible.

I wish I didn’t have to share these things with you. I would be happy to hear from you about this matter. If I am wrong in any way please correct me.

Kind regards


Simon Southerton


Ph (07) 3289 1814
Email: southertons@ozemail.com.au

6 comments:

  1. "I am also certain that many Latter-day Saints will struggle with this concept as I have."

    You turned out to be more of a prophet than him or any of them.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Simon,

    I love the heartfelt expression of concern for the members of the Church in your letter. I can't think of a better attitude to adopt in order to best help those who are struggling under faulty epistemological assumptions.

    Thanks for sharing!
    Zack Tacorin

    ReplyDelete
  3. See this video for the truth of DNA evidence and the Book of Mormon...
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SStDH3SCj4Q

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks Anonymous for the link to the FAIR youtube clip. I'm happy for people to look at it.

    The errors start at 28 seconds into the DVD. Keith Crandall claims Middle Eastern haplotypes (DNA) have been found in Mesoamerica. That claim is utterly false. He goes on to repeat this nonsense at 3.42 seconds.

    The DVD has improved since they removed several other false claims in it. John Tvedtnes used to claim that a Middle Eastern "N" lineage had been found in North America until I pointed out to him that the "N lineage" the scientist referred to meant "Not fully characterised". That's what happens when you delve into the scientific literature looking for evidence to back up your fixed views. You see connections that are not there. In the earliest version of this DVD he also claimed the X lineage had been found in Mesoamerica which is also false. See my earlier post for my response to this DVD. http://simonsoutherton.blogspot.com.au/2012/03/has-middle-eastern-dna-been-found-in.html

    ReplyDelete
  5. Before taking Mr. Southerton's dismissal of Keith Crandall's claim about Middle Eastern haplotypes in Mayan people, please do your own research into the current research being done on population genetics. Keith Crandall is a well known, reputable expert in population genetics.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The "haplotype" that Keith Crandall claims is Middle Eastern is not a haplotype. It is admixture of European and African nuclear DNA. And it is present in virtually all Native American populations. I describe this in detail in my blog post. Keith has never put his claim down in writing or publicly defended them since. It was an off the cuff claim based on a quick reading of the paper.

    A recent follow up paper on the Maya has shown precisely where the Mayan admixture comes from and none came from the Middle East. I discuss this in detail on my blog.

    http://simonsoutherton.blogspot.com.au/2014/02/lose-limited-geography.html

    ReplyDelete